6 thoughts on “love is

  1. Angel, Nancy Boy is saying he’d rather die with love than without it. Giving of himself to that love (ie that’s the expense and richness; expensive not just having a meaning of cost), and losing bits of himself in that (giving of)love. How is that sad and lonely?

  2. I felt he was saying that without love (the expensive of giving) he would have his whole (soul) intact. Unaffected by love.

  3. Yes, I can understand that reading, but that’s not the reading I took from Nancy Boy’s words. I guess because I wrote the piece with that kind of thought in mind, ie that the expense (richness) of loving is worth dying (loss of self and ego) for.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s